From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farmer v. State of Georgia

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 18, 1991
405 S.E.2d 569 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

A91A0344.

DECIDED APRIL 18, 1991.

Bond forfeiture. Cobb Superior Court. Before Judge Robinson.

Alan I. Begner, Russell G. Burnett, Paul C. Munger, for appellant.

Thomas J. Charron, District Attorney, Debra H. Bernes, Nancy I. Jordan, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.


Appellant seeks to appeal the order of the trial court refusing to set aside a rule absolute giving judgment on a bond forfeiture. Appellant was arrested on September 23, 1987, for violation of OCGA § 16-13-30.1 of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act and was released from custody after posting a cash bond in the amount of $7,000. When appellant failed to appear for arraignment, a notice of execution hearing was sent by mail to him at the address listed on his bond. The hearing was held on May 27, 1988, at which time appellant did not appear, and a judgment absolute was entered against appellant on June 10, 1988. On April 10, 1989, appellant appeared in court, pled guilty to possession of cocaine and was sentenced; almost one year later, appellant filed a Motion to Set Aside Forfeiture of an Appearance Bond seeking to set aside the judgment absolute entered by the trial court on June 10, 1988. The trial court denied the motion, and this appeal followed.

A proceeding brought for forfeiture of a bond is a summary civil action accomplished pursuant to OCGA § 17-6-71. See State v. Slaughter, 246 Ga. 174 (1) ( 269 S.E.2d 446) (1980). A motion to set aside a rule absolute giving judgment on a bond forfeiture can be brought under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d) if there is a nonamendable defect which appears upon the face of the record or pleadings. See Osborne Bonding Co. v. State, 163 Ga. App. 648 ( 295 S.E.2d 577) (1982). However, any appeal from a trial court's ruling on a motion to set aside a judgment can properly be brought before this court only by first securing the grant of an application for discretionary appellate review. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8). Lewis v. Sun Mgmt., 187 Ga. App. 591 ( 370 S.E.2d 840) (1988). See also American Druggists Ins. Co. v. Harris, 253 Ga. 535 ( 322 S.E.2d 496) (1984) dismissing a direct appeal of an order overruling an extraordinary motion for a new trial of a proceeding brought for forfeiture of a bond. Accordingly, this direct appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed. Birdsong, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

DECIDED APRIL 18, 1991.


Summaries of

Farmer v. State of Georgia

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 18, 1991
405 S.E.2d 569 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Farmer v. State of Georgia

Case Details

Full title:FARMER v. STATE OF GEORGIA

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 18, 1991

Citations

405 S.E.2d 569 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)
405 S.E.2d 569