From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farmer v. Harry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 25, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-CV-1404 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 25, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-CV-1404

02-25-2013

RAYSHON FARMER v. LAUREL HARRY, et al.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2013, upon careful and independent consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey and Petitioner's objections thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.
3. The motions for an evidentiary hearing, to expand the record, and for summary judgment are DENIED.
4. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

_______________

J. CURTIS JOYNER, C.J.


Summaries of

Farmer v. Harry

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Feb 25, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-CV-1404 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Farmer v. Harry

Case Details

Full title:RAYSHON FARMER v. LAUREL HARRY, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-CV-1404 (E.D. Pa. Feb. 25, 2013)