From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farmer v. Everett, Director

Supreme Court of Arkansas
May 31, 1983
651 S.W.2d 99 (Ark. 1983)

Opinion

No. 83-100

Opinion delivered May 31, 1983

APPEAL ERROR — DENIAL OF PETITION FOR REVIEW — EFFECT. — A denial of a petition for review does not imply approval or disapproval of the decision.

On Petition to Review the Court of Appeals' Affirmance of the Board of Review of the Arkansas Employment Security Division; petition dismissed.

Marilyn Rauch, Central Arkansas Legal Services, Inc., for petitioner.

Bruce H. Bokony, for respondents.


The Court of Appeals affirmed the Board of Review's denial of unemployment benefits to petitioner, Farmer. Farmer v. Everett, 8 Ark. App. 23, 648 S.W.2d 513 (1983). We granted the petitioner's petition to review that affirmance on May 2, 1983. After carefully studying the issues presented and the record, we are of the view that the petition was imprudently granted. Consequently, we dismiss the petition. As we have said, a denial of a petition for review does not imply approval or disapproval of the decision. Wilson v. City of Pine Bluff, 278 Ark. 65, 643 S.W.2d 569 (1982); Moose v. Gregory, 267 Ark. 86, 590 S.W.2d 662 (1979); Masingill v. State, 278 Ark. 641, 648 S.W.2d 62 (1983).

Petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Farmer v. Everett, Director

Supreme Court of Arkansas
May 31, 1983
651 S.W.2d 99 (Ark. 1983)
Case details for

Farmer v. Everett, Director

Case Details

Full title:William FARMER v. William F. EVERETT, Director of Labor, and ALLRIGHT…

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: May 31, 1983

Citations

651 S.W.2d 99 (Ark. 1983)
651 S.W.2d 99