From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farmer v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Oct 26, 2021
Civil Action 1:21-cv-308 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21-cv-308

10-26-2021

CHARLES M. FARMER v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Michael J. Truncale United States District Judge.

Petitioner Charles M. Farmer, a prisoner confined at the Wynne Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

The Court referred this matter to a magistrate judge for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The magistrate judge recommends denying Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Dkt. 13].

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record and pleadings. Proper notice was given to the petitioner at his last known address. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(C). No. objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge [Dkt. 15] is ADOPTED. Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis [Dkt. 13] is DENIED. Petitioner shall pay the $5.00 filing fee within thirty days of this order.


Summaries of

Farmer v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Oct 26, 2021
Civil Action 1:21-cv-308 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Farmer v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES M. FARMER v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division

Date published: Oct 26, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 1:21-cv-308 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 26, 2021)