From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farmakis v. United States

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Dec 23, 1947
78 F. Supp. 287 (D.D.C. 1947)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 655 — 47.

December 23, 1947.

Warren E. Miller and David S. Allshouse, both of Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

George Morris Fay, U.S. Atty., and D. Vance Swann, and Richard N. Ivins, Attys., Dept. of Justice, all of Washington, D.C., for defendant.

David Rein and Joseph Forer, both of Washington, D.C., for additional defendant Helen E. Farmakis.


Action by Eleanor T. Farmakis against the United States of America to recover on a national service life insurance policy, wherein Helen E. Farmakis was made an additional party defendant.

Judgment for plaintiff.


I am satisfied that the insured intended to change the beneficiary of the insurance policy in this case; that he thought that he was doing so when he executed the designation of beneficiary on a paper which, on its face, was a designation of a beneficiary for a six months gratuity; that he thought that by so doing he had executed the proper paper changing the beneficiary of the policy. The evidence shows that this form had been frequently given to soldiers seeking to change the beneficiary of a policy and had frequently been used for that purpose.

I find, therefore, that the plaintiff, the widow of the insured, is entitled to the proceeds of the policy.


Summaries of

Farmakis v. United States

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Dec 23, 1947
78 F. Supp. 287 (D.D.C. 1947)
Case details for

Farmakis v. United States

Case Details

Full title:FARMAKIS v. UNITED STATES et al

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Dec 23, 1947

Citations

78 F. Supp. 287 (D.D.C. 1947)

Citing Cases

Riley v. United States

And courts generally have given effect to the intention of the insured wherever that intention is supported…

Cotter v. United States

In Citron v. United States, supra, testimony to this effect was made the basis of the Court's decision for…