From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farley v. Villareal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 13, 2012
Case No. 1:11-CV-00708-LJO-GSA (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-CV-00708-LJO-GSA

12-13-2012

BONNIE FARLEY, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LIVINGSTON POLICE OFFICER DANE VILLAREAL, CITY OF LIVINGSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT UNNAMED EMPLOYEES 1 THROUGH 20, CITY OF MERCED POLICE OFFICER LEONE PITABONO, UNNAMED COUNTY OF MERCED EMPLOYEES DESIGNATED AS DOES 11 THROUGH 20; Does 11 THROUGH 30 Defendants,

BORTON PETRINI, LLP Bradley A. Post, Esq., Attorneys for Defendant, CORPORAL DAIHN VILLARREAL, WRONGFULLY SUED HEREIN AS POLICE OFFICER DANE VILLAREAL LAW OFFICE OF NORMAN NEWHOUSE Norman Newhouse, Esq., Attorneys for Plaintiff, BONNIE FARLEY PORTER SCOTT John R. Whitefleet, Esq., Attorneys for Defendant, OFFICER LEONE PINTABONA


Bradley A. Post, Esq. # 127028
BORTON PETRINI, LLP
1104 12th Street
Modesto, California 95354
Telephone: (209) 576-1701
Facsimile : (209) 527-9753
bpost@bortonpetrini.com
Attorneys for Defendants,
CITY OF LIVINGSTON POLICE DEPARTMENT,
CORPORAL DAIHN VILLARREAL,
WRONGFULLY SUED HEREIN AS POLICE
OFFICER DANE VILLAREAL

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO

FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) AND

ORDER


JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

WHEREAS Plaintiff BONNIE FARLEY's ("FARLEY") Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 36) alleged one cause of action against all Defendants, including Defendant DAIHN VILLARREAL ("VILLARREAL"), for Violation of Plaintiff's Civil Right to Be Free from Unreasonable Seizure Under 42 USC § 1983, and The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution Against all Defendants, Acting Under Color of Law and in Their Official Entity or Individual Capacities;

WHEREAS, on November 1, 2012, counsel for Plaintiff FARLEY and Defendant VILLARREAL discussed, and agreed to, the dismissal of all claims alleged against Defendant VILLARREAL in this action, based upon a private settlement between the parties;

WHEREAS, counsel for Defendant VILLARREAL informed counsel for Defendant OFFICER LEONE PINTABONA ("PINTABONA") of Plaintiff FARLEY and Defendant VILLARREAL's agreement regarding settlement and dismissal;

IT IS HEREBY stipulated, by and between all parties to this action, that:

All claims by Plaintiff FARLEY alleged against Defendant VILLARREAL in this action be dismissed with prejudice, pursuantto Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), with each party bearing its own costs.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

BORTON PETRINI, LLP

By: _________________

Bradley A. Post, Esq.,

Attorneys for Defendant,

CORPORAL DAIHN VILLARREAL,

WRONGFULLY SUED HEREIN AS POLICE

OFFICER DANE VILLAREAL

LAW OFFICE OF NORMAN NEWHOUSE

By: _________________

Norman Newhouse, Esq.,

Attorneys for Plaintiff,

BONNIE FARLEY

PORTER SCOTT

By: _________________

John R. Whitefleet, Esq.,

Attorneys for Defendant,

OFFICER LEONE PINTABONA

ORDER

Pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation, all claims by Plaintiff BONNIE FARLEY in this matter, as alleged against Defendant CORPOREAL DAIHN VILLARREAL, are dismissed with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The clerk is directed NOT to close this action. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Farley v. Villareal

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 13, 2012
Case No. 1:11-CV-00708-LJO-GSA (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Farley v. Villareal

Case Details

Full title:BONNIE FARLEY, an individual, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF LIVINGSTON POLICE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 13, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:11-CV-00708-LJO-GSA (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2012)