. See also Farley v. Fairfax Cnty. Sch. Bd., No. 21-1183, 2023 WL 3092979, at *1 (4th Cir. Apr. 26, 2023) (vacating and remanding district court's dismissal of IDEA-related ADA and Section 504 claims where the court did not consider the remedy plaintiff sought). Plaintiffs object to the Magistrate Judge's dismissal of their Section 504 and ADA claims on two bases: first, because those claims “are not simply reformulated IDEA claims,” and second, because those claims seek “monetary damages” not available under IDEA.
Luna Perez, 598 U.S. at 147-48. Accordingly, under the holding in Luna Perez, “a plaintiff may assert a claim for compensatory damages under . . . Section 504 even if he has not exhausted his administrative remedies under the IDEA.” Coleman v. Prince George's Cnty. Bd. of Educ., No. DLB-21-68, 2023 WL 4483594, at *2 (D. Md. June 2, 2023), off'd sub nom., No. 23-1727, 2024 WL 379971 (4th Cir. Feb. 1, 2024); see Farley v. Fairfax Cnty. Sch. Bd., No. 21-1183, 2023 WL 3092979, at *1 (4th Cir. Apr. 26, 2023) (discussing the Luna Perez holding).