From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farley v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Dec 17, 1918
80 So. 895 (Ala. Crim. App. 1918)

Opinion

1 Div. 309.

December 17, 1918.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; Claude A. Grayson, Judge. Frank Farley was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals. Affirmed.

C.W. Tompkins, of Mobile, for appellant.

F. Loyd Tate, Atty. Gen., and E.S. Thigpen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


The defendant was tried and convicted of a violation of the prohibition law, and from the judgment of conviction he appeals. There is no bill of exceptions in the record, and there is a certificate of the presiding judge that no bill of exceptions has been presented and that the time for presenting same has expired. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.


Summaries of

Farley v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Dec 17, 1918
80 So. 895 (Ala. Crim. App. 1918)
Case details for

Farley v. State

Case Details

Full title:FARLEY v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Dec 17, 1918

Citations

80 So. 895 (Ala. Crim. App. 1918)
16 Ala. App. 700