From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farish v. Horton

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 27, 2022
2:21-cv-2 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 27, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-2

02-27-2022

DENZELL FARISH, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE HORTON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JANET T. NEFF, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a prisoner civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge, who issued a Report and Recommendation on January 20, 2022, recommending that this Court grant the motion and enter judgment in favor of Defendants. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties. No objections have been filed. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 33) is APPROVED and ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that an appeal of this decision would not be taken in good faith because Plaintiff failed to file any objections. See McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 610-11 (6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199, 206, 211-12 (2007).

A Judgment will be entered consistent with this Order.


Summaries of

Farish v. Horton

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 27, 2022
2:21-cv-2 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Farish v. Horton

Case Details

Full title:DENZELL FARISH, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE HORTON, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 27, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-2 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 27, 2022)