From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Farish v. Bankers Multiple Line Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 9, 1985
476 So. 2d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 83-1828.

October 9, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Timothy P. Poulton, J. and Lamar Warren, Retired, J.

Douglas E. Thompson of Farish, Farish Romani, West Palm Beach, for appellants.

Richard A. Kupfer of Cone, Wagner, Nugent, Johnson, Roth Romano, P.A., and Pariente Silber, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.


Contrary to the appellants' contentions, we conclude (a) that the trial court neither lacked jurisdiction, see Bailey v. Bailey, 392 So.2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), nor abused its discretion, see Williams v. Nussbaum, 419 So.2d 715 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), in permitting the purported partners of the plaintiff Farish to intervene as parties plaintiff in the litigation involved in Bankers Multiple Line Ins. Co. v. Farish, 464 So.2d 530 (Fla. 1985); (b) that there was no harmful error in requiring that the percentage partnership share in the judgment asserted by the intervenors be escrowed in an interest bearing account pending determination of the merits of their claim.

Affirmed.

SCHWARTZ, ALAN R.; HUBBART, PHILLIP A.; and JORGENSON, JAMES R., Associate Judges, concur.


Summaries of

Farish v. Bankers Multiple Line Ins. Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 9, 1985
476 So. 2d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Farish v. Bankers Multiple Line Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH D. FARISH, JR., AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH D. FARISH…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 9, 1985

Citations

476 So. 2d 300 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)