From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faris v. Lampson

Supreme Court of California
Aug 16, 1887
73 Cal. 190 (Cal. 1887)

Opinion

         Department One

         Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Calaveras County.

         COUNSEL:

         Wesley K. Boucher, for Appellants.

          J. A. Louttit, S.D. Woods, and A. L. Levinsky, for Respondents.


         JUDGES: Foote, C. Belcher, C. C., and Hayne, C., concurred.

         OPINION

          FOOTE, Judge

          [14 P. 675] In this case no oral argument was had, nor did the appellants file any points or authorities; and having thus omitted to point out the errors of which they complain, the judgment should be affirmed without an examination of the record. (Mokelumne H. C. M. Co. v. Woodbury , 10 Cal. 188; Edmondson v. Alameda Co ., 24 Cal. 350; Holm v. Roach , 25 Cal. 37; Hickinbotham v. Monroe , 28 Cal. 489; Brewster v. Johnson , 51 Cal. 222; Estate of Montgomery , 59 Cal. 583.)

         The Court. -- For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion, judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Faris v. Lampson

Supreme Court of California
Aug 16, 1887
73 Cal. 190 (Cal. 1887)
Case details for

Faris v. Lampson

Case Details

Full title:FANNIE FARIS et al., Respondents, v. DAVID LAMPSON et al., Appellants

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Aug 16, 1887

Citations

73 Cal. 190 (Cal. 1887)
14 P. 674

Citing Cases

McFadden v. Dietz

If appellant's points and authorities be not filed with the clerk of the supreme court together with proof of…