From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fargo v. Louis

Supreme Court, Kings County
Sep 25, 2019
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 35151 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2019)

Opinion

Index No. 515917/17

09-25-2019

WELLS FARGO, Plaintiff, v. CLAYVAN ST LOUIS et al, Defendant,


Unpublished Opinion

PRESENT: HON. NOACH DEAR, J.S.C.

DECISION AND ORDER

NOACH DEAR, JUDGE.

Recitation, as required by CPLR §2219 (a), of the papers considered in the review of this Motion:

Papers

Numbered

Motion (MS1)

1

Opposition/Cross (MS 2)

2

Reply/Opp to Cross

3

Cross-Reply

4

Upon the foregoing cited papers, the Decision/Order on this Motion is as follows:

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment and other relief. Defendant cross-moves for dismissal, alleging that the instant action is untimely and that Plaintiff failed to comply with RPAPL 1304.

Issues of fact remain as to whether the 2010 letter accelerated the loan (whether it was sent, when [critical in light of the potential for the de-acceleration to be a day late], on behalf of whom, etc.) and whether the 2016 letter de-accelerated it (insufficient admissible evidence has been proffered to demonstrate conclusively that it was sent [Plaintiff relies on an affidavit created years later and likely not based upon recall], was it pre-textual [the timing suggests it might have been], etc.). Issues, thus, remain as to the timeliness of this action. (It is clear, however, that Plaintiff is barred from collecting installments due more than six years prior to the commencement of this action.)

Plaintiff has demonstrated compliance with RPAPL 1304 through the Daronche Aff and appended records. Defendant's arguments as to the contents of the notice are unavailing.

Plaintiff has sufficiently addressed Defendant's first through fourteenth affirmative defenses and first through fifth counterclaims and, in the absence of any meaningful argument thereupon by Defendant, those defenses and claims are dismissed. Likewise, Plaintiff has demonstrated its entitlement to default judgment against the non-appearing defendants and to amend the caption as requested.

Plaintiffs motion granted to the above extent. Defendant's cross-motion denied. Parties to proceed to complete discovery and proceed to trial on the remaining issue.


Summaries of

Fargo v. Louis

Supreme Court, Kings County
Sep 25, 2019
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 35151 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2019)
Case details for

Fargo v. Louis

Case Details

Full title:WELLS FARGO, Plaintiff, v. CLAYVAN ST LOUIS et al, Defendant,

Court:Supreme Court, Kings County

Date published: Sep 25, 2019

Citations

2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 35151 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2019)