From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fardette v. New York and Stamford Railway Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 31, 1922
135 N.E. 969 (N.Y. 1922)

Opinion

Argued May 5, 1922

Decided May 31, 1922

Eugene F. McKinley, Ralph P. Buell and John B. Knox for appellant.

Sydney A. Syme for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., HOGAN, CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE and ANDREWS, JJ.


Summaries of

Fardette v. New York and Stamford Railway Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 31, 1922
135 N.E. 969 (N.Y. 1922)
Case details for

Fardette v. New York and Stamford Railway Company

Case Details

Full title:AMELIA M. FARDETTE, as Administratrix of the Estate of BRENTWOOD F…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 31, 1922

Citations

135 N.E. 969 (N.Y. 1922)
135 N.E. 969

Citing Cases

Olsen v. New York Central Railroad Company

The question was properly submitted to the jury. See e.g., Fardette v. New York Stamford Ry. Co., 190 App.…

O'Leary v. American Airlines

The instant situation is thus distinguishable from those cases in which carriers were held liable for actions…