Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-cv-01349-BNB
07-05-2012
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff, Mohamed Osman Faray, currently resides in Glendale, Colorado. Mr. Faray, acting pro se, initiated this action by submitting a Complaint to the Court. On May 25, 2012, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland directed Mr. Faray to cure certain deficiencies if he wished to pursue his claims. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Boland ordered Mr. Faray to submit a properly completed Complaint form and a Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 that is properly notarized, has a complete affidavit, and states if he seeks service of process by the United States Marshals Service. Mr. Faray was warned that the action would be dismissed without further notice if he failed to cure the deficiencies within thirty days.
Mr. Faray has failed to communicate with the Court, and as a result, he has failed to cure the deficiencies within the time allowed.
Finally, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order is not taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Mr. Faray files a notice of appeal he must pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to cure the deficiencies within the time allowed. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied.
DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 5th day of July, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
_____________________________
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge
United States District Court