From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faratzis v. Cnty. of L.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 6, 2013
CASE NO. CV 12-7396 BRO (MANx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV 12-7396 BRO (MANx)

11-06-2013

JOHN FARATZIS, JOHN SABIN FARATZIS, and JOSEPH FARATZIS, Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a political subdivision of the State of California; DEPUTY J. MINER (#509732); DEPUTY J. TELLES (#525042) and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, Defendants.

JOHN F. KRATTLI, County Counsel ROGER H. GRANBO, Assistant County Counsel EDWIN A. LEWIS, Senior Deputy County Counsel Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Deputy J. MINER, Deputy REDENBAUGH and Deputy J. TELLES


JOHN F. KRATTLI, County Counsel
ROGER H. GRANBO, Assistant County Counsel
EDWIN A. LEWIS, Senior Deputy County Counsel
Attorneys for Defendants
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Deputy J. MINER, Deputy
REDENBAUGH and Deputy J. TELLES

ORDER AND JUDGMENT


Action Filed: August 31, 2012

Discovery Cutoff: July 31, 2013

Motion Cutoff: August 30, 2013

Trial Date: December 3, 2013

Defendants COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Deputy J. MINER, Deputy REDENBAUGH and Deputy J. TELLES'S Motion for Summary Judgment having been fully considered based upon the evidence, the separate statements, the memorandum of points and authorities filed herein, the Court finds there are no triable issues of material fact in this action and that Defendants are entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.

IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT summary judgment be, and hereby is entered in favor of Defendants COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Deputy J. MINER, Deputy REDENBAUGH and Deputy J. TELLES and against Plaintiffs JOHN FARATZIS, JOHN SABIN FARATZIS, and JOSEPH FARATZIS as to all causes of action.

Furthermore, the Court having considered Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint finds that the Motion is untimely having been filed after the Court ordered deadline of August 30, 2013 and the Court independently finds that the proposed amendment is futile inasmuch as it does not appear to add any genuine material to the complaint. Therefore, the Motion to Amend is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

HONORABLE BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Faratzis v. Cnty. of L.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 6, 2013
CASE NO. CV 12-7396 BRO (MANx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Faratzis v. Cnty. of L.A.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN FARATZIS, JOHN SABIN FARATZIS, and JOSEPH FARATZIS, Plaintiffs, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 6, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. CV 12-7396 BRO (MANx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 6, 2013)