From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faranca v. Bonilla

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Apr 27, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-1749 (MLC) (D.N.J. Apr. 27, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-1749 (MLC).

April 27, 2006


MEMORANDUM OPINION


THE PLAINTIFFS (1) advising the Court that "this matter has been settled, by and between the parties," and (2) requesting that the Court "issue the appropriate Order" (4-26-06 Sobel Letter); and thus the Court intending to (1) deny the defendants' pending motion to vacate the order, entered October 6, 2005, granting the plaintiffs' motion for entry of judgment by default on the issue of liability (dkt. entry no. 22) without prejudice, and (2) dismiss the complaint (a) without costs and (b) without prejudice to reopen the action on good cause shown within 60 days if the settlement is not consummated; and for good cause appearing, the Court will issue an appropriate order and judgment.


Summaries of

Faranca v. Bonilla

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Apr 27, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-1749 (MLC) (D.N.J. Apr. 27, 2006)
Case details for

Faranca v. Bonilla

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY FARANCA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. LUIS BONILLA, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Apr 27, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-1749 (MLC) (D.N.J. Apr. 27, 2006)