From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fanroth v. Falkner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 1988
137 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

February 8, 1988

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Krausman, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the record reveals that he was afforded ample opportunity to interpose all relevant objections and defenses in opposition to the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. Moreover, a review of the defendant's conclusory opposing allegations establishes that the court properly granted summary judgment to the plaintiffs. Lawrence, J.P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Fanroth v. Falkner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 8, 1988
137 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

Fanroth v. Falkner

Case Details

Full title:DIANE FANROTH et al., Respondents, v. ARTHUR FALKNER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 8, 1988

Citations

137 A.D.2d 581 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

Wilbur v. Wilbur

si v. Santoro, 262 A.D.2d 270 [2d Dept., June 1, 1999]; Piccirillo v. Friedman, 244 A.D.2d 469; Bufogle v.…