Fanning v. Miami Dolphins Ltd.

Full title: John FANNING, Appellant, v. MIAMI DOLPHINS LTD., etc., et al., Appellees.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

322 So. 3d 1217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 3D20-1572

07-14-2021

John FANNING, Appellant, v. MIAMI DOLPHINS LTD., etc., et al., Appellees.

Robert Allen Law, P.A., and Adrian Karborani; Davis Goldman, PLLC, and Aaron P. Davis, Jason N. Goldman and Daniel B. Allison, for appellant. Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, and Angela C. de Cespedes and Samuel E. Bordoni-Cowley, for appellee South Florida Stadium, LLC.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Allen Law, P.A., and Adrian Karborani; Davis Goldman, PLLC, and Aaron P. Davis, Jason N. Goldman and Daniel B. Allison, for appellant.

Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP, and Angela C. de Cespedes and Samuel E. Bordoni-Cowley, for appellee South Florida Stadium, LLC.

Before SCALES, HENDON and MILLER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Araujo v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 290 So. 3d 936, 941-42 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (concluding that a trial court does not abuse its discretion by denying a claim for expenses under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.380(c) where the requesting party sought admission of a hotly-contested issue that was central to the case).