From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fanning v. Maggi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 28, 1953
282 App. Div. 1067 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Opinion

December 28, 1953.

Present — Nolan, P.J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Beldock, JJ.


In an action for brokerage commissions, defendant Maggi appeals from a judgment insofar as it is against him and in favor of plaintiff and from so much of an order as denies his motion to set aside the verdict, for a dismissal of the complaint or for a new trial. Judgment and order insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs. The judgment is supported by the proof, and any variance between the pleading and the proof may be disregarded as immaterial. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 434; cf. Thorne Neale Co. v. New York So. Coal Term. Corp., 270 App. Div. 816, affd. 295 N.Y. 977, and Slotnick v. Klein, 280 App. Div. 984. )


Summaries of

Fanning v. Maggi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 28, 1953
282 App. Div. 1067 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)
Case details for

Fanning v. Maggi

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS J. FANNING, Respondent, v. JOSEPH MAGGI, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 28, 1953

Citations

282 App. Div. 1067 (N.Y. App. Div. 1953)

Citing Cases

Zuckerman v. Martin

" Accordingly, the courts have held if the broker procures a buyer ready, willing, and able to carry out the…

Gaylen Machinery Corp. v. Pitman-Moore Company

Here, however, there was sufficient additional evidence bearing on effective cause to justify submission of…