From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fandel v. Fandel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Sep 22, 2015
Case No. 2:15-CV-01430-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Sep. 22, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 2:15-CV-01430-JCM-PAL

09-22-2015

HERMAN E. FANDEL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RALPH A. FANDEL, et al., Defendants.

CAROLINE D. CIRAOLO Acting Assistant Attorney General GERALD A. ROLE (IL #6198922) Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box 683 Washington, D.C. 20044 T: 202-307-0461 F: 202-307-0054 gerald.a.role@usdoj.gov Attorneys for defendant United States of America


CAROLINE D. CIRAOLO
Acting Assistant Attorney General
GERALD A. ROLE (IL #6198922)
Trial Attorney, Tax Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 683
Washington, D.C. 20044
T: 202-307-0461
F: 202-307-0054
gerald.a.role@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for defendant
United States of America
(Removal of Case No. A-14-701864-C from the District Court of Clark County, Nevada)

UNITED STATES' MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE PLEAD; ORDER THEREON (Second Request)

The United States of America, through undersigned counsel, respectfully moves this Court for an order extending to October 8, 2015, the time in which it must respond to plaintiffs' verified first amended complaint. In support of its motion, the United States asserts as follows:

1. The United States Attorney for the District of Nevada was served with the summons and complaint in intervention in this action on July 9, 2015.

2. On July 27, 2015, this case was timely removed from the District Court of Clark County to this Court.

3. On July 28, 2015, the United States filed its first motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise plead. This was to address the anomaly under the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure which provides the United States far less time to serve its answer or other responsive pleading in a removed action than it would receive if it were sued in Federal court in the first place. In this case, the government would have had only 25 days to respond under Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c)(2)(C), rather than the 60 days afforded it under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(2).

4. On July 31, 2015, the Court granted the motion for extension of time. (Doc. 5).

5. The United States respectfully requests a second extension of time, as counsel for the United States has not yet received from the Internal Revenue Service the material necessary to respond to the complaint and defend its interests, as well as obtain the Service's views on the matter. This motion is not being made for delay, but to permit the United States to prepare a cogent and accurate response which would advance this litigation.

6. Both the Federal and local civil rules authorize this Court to grant, for good cause, an extension of time in which to answer or otherwise plead. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b); LR 6-1.

7. In moving for an extension of time, the United States does not waive any defenses listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h).

For these reasons, the United States requests that its motion for an extension of time be granted, and that it be given until and including October 8, 2015, in which to serve its response to plaintiffs' complaint.

Dated: September 8, 2015.

Respectfully submitted,

CAROLINE D. CIRAOLO

Acting Assistant Attorney General

/s/ Gerald A . Role

GERALD A. ROLE (IL #6198922)

Trial Attorney, Tax Division

U.S. Department of Justice

P.O. Box 683

Washington, D.C. 20044

Telephone: (202) 307-0461

Fax: (202) 307-0054

Email: gerald.a.role@usdoj.gov
IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

PEGGY A. LEEN

United States Magistrate Judge

Dated: September 22, 2015

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

IT IS CERTIFIED that the foregoing was served this 8th day of September, 2015, by filing it with the Court's CM/ECF system, which will electronically transmit copies thereof to:

Zachary T. Ball, Esq.
The Ball Law Group
3455 Cliff Shadows Parkway, Suite 150
Las Vegas, Nevada 89129
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

/s/ Gerald A . Role

GERALD A. ROLE


Summaries of

Fandel v. Fandel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Sep 22, 2015
Case No. 2:15-CV-01430-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Sep. 22, 2015)
Case details for

Fandel v. Fandel

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN E. FANDEL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. RALPH A. FANDEL, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 22, 2015

Citations

Case No. 2:15-CV-01430-JCM-PAL (D. Nev. Sep. 22, 2015)