Opinion
No. 20-1069
07-20-2020
FREDDY FAMBA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RITE AID OF MARYLAND, INC., Defendant - Appellee.
Freddy Famba, Appellant Pro Se. Ariana K. DeJan-Lenoir, Zachary Lee Erwin, ANDERSON, COE & KING, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Stephanie A. Gallagher, District Judge. (1:18-cv-03091-SAG) Before FLOYD, THACKER, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Freddy Famba, Appellant Pro Se. Ariana K. DeJan-Lenoir, Zachary Lee Erwin, ANDERSON, COE & KING, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Freddy Famba appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to Famba's former employer, Rite Aid of Maryland, Inc. ("Rite Aid"), in his employment discrimination action. Specifically, Famba asserted disability discrimination and failure-to-accommodate claims pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213 (2018), and the Maryland Fair Employment Practices Act, Md. Code Ann., State Gov't §§ 20-601 to 20-611 (2014 & Supp. 2019), based on Rite Aid's alleged failure to accommodate Famba's post-surgical lifting and postural limitations and later terminating Famba's employment as a warehouse stocker.
Upon review of the summary judgment record, we discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the grant of summary judgment for the reasons stated by the district court. Famba v. Rite Aid of Md., Inc., No. 1:18-cv-03091-SAG (D. Md. Dec. 19, 2019). We deny Famba's request for the appointment of counsel on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED