Opinion
CASE NO.: SC13-1044 Lower Tribunal No.: 5D13-1372 Lower Tribunal No.: 2009-CA-00724
01-10-2014
DAVID V. FALZON, ET AL. Petitioner(s) v. CHARLES E. WEATHERBEE, ETC. Respondent(s)
Because petitioners have failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, they are not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). PARIENTE, LEWIS, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur. A True Copy
Test:
__________
John A. Tomasino
Clerk, Supreme Court
kb
Served:
MARISA RAE COCHRANE
JERRI A. BLAIR
DAVID E. CAUTHEN
ADAM MATTHEW SHONSON
HON. NEIL KELLY, CLERK
HON. PAMELA R. MASTERS, CLERK