Opinion
22-1068
12-08-2022
MARIE FALTAS, M.D., M.P.H., on behalf of herself and classes she represents, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LARRY MCCANTS, in his official capacity, Defendant-Appellee.
Marie Therese Assa'ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se.
UNPUBLISHED
Submitted: November 21, 2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:92-cv-02786-JFA)
Marie Therese Assa'ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se.
Before NIEMEYER, RUSHING, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM
Marie Therese Assa'ad-Faltas appeals the district court's text order denying her renewed Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. See Assa'ad-Faltas v. McCants, No. 3:92-cv-02786-JFA (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2022); see also Dowell v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Auto. Ins. Co., 993 F.2d 46, 48 (4th Cir. 1993) (recognizing that a Rule 60(b) movant must make a threshold showing of "timeliness, a meritorious defense, a lack of unfair prejudice to the opposing party, and exceptional circumstances" (internal quotation marks omitted)); McLawhorn v. John W. Daniel &Co., 924 F.2d 535, 538 (4th Cir. 1991) ("[A] Rule 60(b) motion is not timely brought when it is made three to four months after the original judgment and no valid reason is given for the delay."). We deny all pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.