From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Falstaff Brewing Corp. v. Dependahl

U.S.
Nov 2, 1981
454 U.S. 968 (1981)

Summary

holding that "[i]f Congress has already provided a remedy for the violation of the former executives' benefit plans, then once Congress has expressed its intention to occupy the field, the state law is preempted, regardless of whether or not a conflict exists which involves a direct interference by the state law with the substantive federal legislation"

Summary of this case from Lea v. Republic Airlines, Inc.

Opinion

No. 81-449.

November 2, 1981, October TERM, 1981.


C.A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 653 F. 2d 1208.


Summaries of

Falstaff Brewing Corp. v. Dependahl

U.S.
Nov 2, 1981
454 U.S. 968 (1981)

holding that "[i]f Congress has already provided a remedy for the violation of the former executives' benefit plans, then once Congress has expressed its intention to occupy the field, the state law is preempted, regardless of whether or not a conflict exists which involves a direct interference by the state law with the substantive federal legislation"

Summary of this case from Lea v. Republic Airlines, Inc.

holding that "the work of the law clerks and legal assistants is compensable under an award of attorney's fees."

Summary of this case from Gopher Oil Co. v. Union Oil Co.

growing crops

Summary of this case from LaCombe v. A-T-O, Inc.

using the Missouri statutory rate

Summary of this case from Williams v. Reiber

using the Missouri statutory rate

Summary of this case from Frank v. Relin

construing 29 U.S.C. § 1132(B), prejudgment interest is part of remedial relief to be awarded in an action to recover benefits

Summary of this case from Allison v. Dugan, (N.D.Ind. 1990)
Case details for

Falstaff Brewing Corp. v. Dependahl

Case Details

Full title:FALSTAFF BREWING CORP. ET AL. v. DEPENDAHL ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 2, 1981

Citations

454 U.S. 968 (1981)

Citing Cases

Wilken v. AT&T Technologies, Inc.

In Alessi, supra, the Supreme Court held that a similar state law be preempted by ERISA. The instant…

Walker v. Mountain States Tel. Tel. Co.

The plaintiffs argue that the present circumstances are distinguishable from the cases cited, particularly in…