From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fallon v. Pacific Laboratories, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2006
Civ. S-05-2289 MCE PAN PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2006)

Opinion

Civ. S-05-2289 MCE PAN PS.

February 1, 2006


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


On December 12, 2005, plaintiff was ordered to respond in writing by January 6, 2006, and appear before this court January 11, 2006, to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed upon him for again filing a clearly frivolous complaint in this court.

Plaintiff neither responded in writing nor appeared at the hearing.

For the reasons set forth in the order to show cause, I recommend dismissal of this action. Fed.R.Civ.P. 11 and 12(b)(6), 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii); Nietzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327-28 (1989) (a frivolous complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 presents fanciful factual allegations and inarguable legal conclusions).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr., the United States District Judge assigned to this case. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Written objections may be filed within ten days after being served with these findings and recommendations. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." The failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Fallon v. Pacific Laboratories, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 1, 2006
Civ. S-05-2289 MCE PAN PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2006)
Case details for

Fallon v. Pacific Laboratories, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID ANTHONY FALLON, Plaintiff, v. PACIFIC LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 1, 2006

Citations

Civ. S-05-2289 MCE PAN PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 1, 2006)