From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Falk v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Nov 25, 2014
497 Mich. 906 (Mich. 2014)

Opinion

Docket No. 149308.

11-25-2014

Allan FALK, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.


Order

On order of the Court, the motion for entry of default judgment is DENIED. The motion to amend the complaint for superintending control is DENIED without prejudice to the plaintiff seeking relief in a separate complaint for superintending control regarding AGC File No. 0259–13. With respect to the request for investigation that is referred to in paragraph 47D of the proposed amended complaint for superintending control, the defendant is DIRECTED to follow the procedures set forth in MCR 9.131. The complaint for superintending control is considered, and relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief.


Summaries of

Falk v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Nov 25, 2014
497 Mich. 906 (Mich. 2014)
Case details for

Falk v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:Allan FALK, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Nov 25, 2014

Citations

497 Mich. 906 (Mich. 2014)
856 N.W.2d 16