From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fales v. Witkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 19, 1971
36 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Opinion

January 19, 1971


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 28, 1970, insofar as it denied defendants-appellants' motion for summary judgment dismissing complaint, unanimously affirmed. Respondents shall recover of appellants $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The meagre and incomplete record does not even include a copy of the complaint sought to be dismissed. Our affirmance is based upon our understanding that Special Term merely held, and we agree, that "on this record it may not be held that plaintiff will be precluded by said prior order from introducing evidence at the trial sufficient to make a prima facie case." ( Jersey v. Glode Requa Coal Lbr. Co., 13 A.D.2d 507, 508.)

Concur — Stevens, P.J., Capozzoli, Markewich, Kupferman and Tilzer, JJ.


Summaries of

Fales v. Witkowski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 19, 1971
36 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)
Case details for

Fales v. Witkowski

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY T. FALES et al., Respondents, v. EDWARD S. WITKOWSKI et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 19, 1971

Citations

36 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971)

Citing Cases

Vandoros v. Kovacevic

There appear to be different rules in the various departments as to whether a preclusion order, standing…

Dhirubhai Shah v. American Honda Motor Co.

The defendants' submission, however, was devoid of any evidence or legal argument in support of that…