Opinion
Civil Action 20-23921-Civ-Scola
09-07-2022
Barbara De La Caridad Falcon, Plaintiff, v. Andrew Saul, Defendant.
ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Robert N. Scola, Jr. United States District Judge.
Neither party has objected to Magistrate Judge Torres's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21) concerning the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment and the time to do so has passed.
A district court need conduct a de novo review of only “those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636. Where no objections are made, a report may be adopted in full without conducting de novo review provided no plain error exists. E.g., id.; Menendez v. Naples Cmty. Hosp., Inc., No. 2:20-CV-898-SPC-MRM, 2021 WL 5178496, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 8, 2021) (collecting cases).
Finding no plain error with Judge Torres's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 21), the Court adopts it in full. Accordingly, the Court denies the Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 19) and grants the Defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 20). Any other pending motions are denied as moot. The Court directs the Clerk to close this case.
Done and ordered.