From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Falco v. N.Y., New Haven and Hartford Rail. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1914
161 App. Div. 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)

Opinion

January, 1914.


Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to defendant, and motion denied upon the ground that the affidavit upon which the order is based states no fact whatever justifying the inference that defendant has in its possession any information that the decedent was killed by any detached or flying fragment from defendant's train or that defendant actually or inferentially has the same in its possession, or that any reports have been made to it with reference to such parts. Without otherwise passing on the merits of the motion, leave is given to renew upon affidavits which shall suitably inform the court as to the nature and cause of the accident. Jenks, P.J., Burr, Thomas, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Falco v. N.Y., New Haven and Hartford Rail. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1914
161 App. Div. 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)
Case details for

Falco v. N.Y., New Haven and Hartford Rail. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Rose Falco, as Administratrix, etc., of Andrew Falco, Deceased…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1914

Citations

161 App. Div. 889 (N.Y. App. Div. 1914)