From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Falchook Markets, Inc. v. Warner Reciprocal Insurers

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 13, 1977
42 N.Y.2d 1063 (N.Y. 1977)

Opinion

Argued August 31, 1977

Decided October 13, 1977

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, IRVING KIRSCHENBAUM, J.

Milton B. Pfeffer for appellants-respondents.

Robert S. Newman for respondents-appellants.

Roy E. Pomerantz for Taaffe Travers Associates, Inc., respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division is modified by remitting the case to Supreme Court for a determination of actual damages upon proper proof, and as so modified, it is affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs.

In response to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment in an action on a fire insurance policy issued by Warner Reciprocal Insurers, no triable issue of fact as to the existence and ownership of the policy by Falchook Markets, Inc., nor as to whether Falchook was bound by the mortgagee's unauthorized tender of the policy for cancellation, was created by the insurer, and the determination by the Appellate Division granting summary judgment to Falchook will not be disturbed (CPLR 3212; 4 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N Y Civ Prac, par 3212.05). However, only provable damages may be recovered and since no proper proof of the actual damage was submitted, the matter should be remitted for a determination of damages. In light of our affirmance of the grant of summary judgment, we need not reach the contingent cross appeal by plaintiffs.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG, and COOKE concur.

Order modified and the case remitted to Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed, with costs to plaintiffs.


Summaries of

Falchook Markets, Inc. v. Warner Reciprocal Insurers

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 13, 1977
42 N.Y.2d 1063 (N.Y. 1977)
Case details for

Falchook Markets, Inc. v. Warner Reciprocal Insurers

Case Details

Full title:FALCHOOK MARKETS, INC., et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. WARNER…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 13, 1977

Citations

42 N.Y.2d 1063 (N.Y. 1977)
399 N.Y.S.2d 636
369 N.E.2d 1169

Citing Cases

Soho Generation of New York, Inc. v. Tri-City Insurance Brokers, Inc.

Plaintiff contends that since the standard is that which the insurer would have paid, its damages may be…

Manning v. Tiffany Brokers

Further, there is evidence that the plaintiffs believed the premises to be insured for $30,000, the same…