From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fajana v. Howard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jan 31, 2020
Civil Action No. 19-3160 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jan. 31, 2020)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 19-3160 (UNA)

01-31-2020

Paul A. Fajana, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey R. Howard et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Plaintiff, appearing pro se, has filed a motion under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for relief from the order entered on October 31, 2019, which dismissed this action on the ground of absolute immunity. See Mem. Op. [Dkt. 3]. In its discretion, a court may relieve a party from a final judgment, order or proceeding for any one of six enumerated reasons. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1)-(6). Plaintiff invokes paragraph four, which authorizes relief from a void judgment. Plaintiff's puzzling assertions and exhibits fail sorely to establish any defects in the judgment or to support any other ground for relief. Therefore, his motion is denied. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion. Date: January 31, 2020

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Fajana v. Howard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jan 31, 2020
Civil Action No. 19-3160 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jan. 31, 2020)
Case details for

Fajana v. Howard

Case Details

Full title:Paul A. Fajana, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey R. Howard et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jan 31, 2020

Citations

Civil Action No. 19-3160 (UNA) (D.D.C. Jan. 31, 2020)