From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faith v. Town of Goshen

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Dec 26, 2018
167 A.D.3d 986 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

2016–02661 Index No. 9735/12

12-26-2018

Shelia FAITH, et al., Appellants, v. TOWN OF GOSHEN, Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Sussman and Watkins, Goshen, N.Y. (Michael H. Sussman and Jonathan R. Goldman of counsel), for appellants. Langdon C. Chapman, County Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (Joseph F. Mahoney of counsel), for respondent.


Sussman and Watkins, Goshen, N.Y. (Michael H. Sussman and Jonathan R. Goldman of counsel), for appellants.

Langdon C. Chapman, County Attorney, Goshen, N.Y. (Joseph F. Mahoney of counsel), for respondent.

ALAN D. SCHEINKMAN, P.J., MARK C. DILLON, JEFFREY A. COHEN, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs each own real property that abuts or is proximate to the Wallkill River. Adjacent to the Wallkill River is the Orange County Landfill (hereinafter the Landfill), which is owned, operated, and maintained by the defendant County of Orange. In August 2011, the Wallkill River flooded, resulting in damage to the plaintiffs' properties. Thereafter, the plaintiffs commenced this action against, among others, the County, alleging, inter alia, that the County failed "to maintain and ensure the structural ... stability and integrity of the Landfill." The plaintiffs alleged that as a result of this negligent maintenance, the Landfill pushed earth into the river, creating a "pinch point" that has obstructed the waterway. The County moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. By order dated January 15, 2016, the Supreme Court granted the motion. The plaintiffs appeal.

We agree with the Supreme Court's determination that the plaintiffs were precluded from asserting a cause of action against the County for negligent maintenance of the Wallkill River, as that cause of action was not properly noticed in the notice of claim (see General Municipal Law § 50–e ; Ana R. v. New York City Hous. Auth., 95 A.D.3d 981, 943 N.Y.S.2d 765 ; Semprini v. Village of Southampton, 48 A.D.3d 543, 544, 852 N.Y.S.2d 208 ).

The plaintiffs' cause of action alleging negligent maintenance of the Landfill was abandoned by the plaintiffs in their opposition to the County's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

SCHEINKMAN, P.J., DILLON, COHEN and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Faith v. Town of Goshen

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Dec 26, 2018
167 A.D.3d 986 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Faith v. Town of Goshen

Case Details

Full title:Shelia Faith, et al., appellants, v. Town of Goshen, respondents, et al.…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Dec 26, 2018

Citations

167 A.D.3d 986 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 8917
88 N.Y.S.3d 909

Citing Cases

114 Woodbury Realty, LLC v. 10 Bethpage Rd., LLC

On appeal, the plaintiffs further confirmed that they have abandoned the second through sixth causes of…