Opinion
CASE NO. 1D17–0462
04-28-2017
William E. Corley, III, Panama City Beach, for Appellant. No appearance for Appellee.
William E. Corley, III, Panama City Beach, for Appellant.
No appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The Court has determined that the order on appeal is not "one that disposes of a separate and distinct cause of action that is not interdependent with other pleaded claims." Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(k) ; Jensen v. Whetstine , 985 So.2d 1218, 1220–1221 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (holding that an order is not an appealable partial final judgment where there is a factual overlap between the claim resolved by the order and a pending claim). Therefore, the order does not constitute a partial final judgment subject to immediate review pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(k). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
ROWE, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.