Where deeds from husband to the wife recite that the consideration was paid out of her separate funds and estate and for her separate use and benefit, a clear intention of the husband to convey the land therein described to his wife as her separate property is shown, and parol evidence was not admissible to show that such was not his intention. Emery v. Barfield, 156 S.W. 311; Id., 107 Tex. 291; Bird v. Lester, 166 S.W. 112; Kahn v. Kahn, 94 Tex. 114, 58 S.W. 827; Markum v. Markum, 210 S.W. 835; Johnson v. Johnson, 14 S.W.2d 805; Faison v. Faison, 31 S.W.2d 828. MR. JUDGE SMEDLEY delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section B.