From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faison v. Deal

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 25, 2007
231 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-7823.

Submitted: June 15, 2007.

Decided: June 25, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-00050).

Moses Faison, Appellant Pro Se. James Philip Allen, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Moses Faison appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Faison v. Deal, No. 5:06-cv-00050, 2006 WL 2668380 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 15, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Faison v. Deal

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 25, 2007
231 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Faison v. Deal

Case Details

Full title:Moses FAISON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Officer DEAL, Defendant-Appellee…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 25, 2007

Citations

231 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2007)