From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fairley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Apr 1, 2009
Civil No. 08-10924 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 1, 2009)

Opinion

Civil No. 08-10924.

April 1, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


I have before me, Magistrate Judge Michael Hluchaniuk's Report and Recommendation ("Report"). In his Report, Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk recommends that I grant Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Neither party has filed objections to Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk's Report during the time set aside for doing so.

If a party objects to specific portions of a report and recommendation within the allotted time, the Court should "make a de novo determination of those portions." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). If neither party objects to the report and recommendation in the time set aside for doing so, a district court need not review it by any standard. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), see also Lardie v. Birkett, 221 F.Supp.2d 806, 807 (E.D. Mich. 2002). A district court "may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the finding or recommendation made by the magistrate." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

I find that Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk has throughly and correctly analyzed the issues and I agree with his recommendation. For these reasons, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Hluchaniuk's Report and GRANT Defendant's Motion to Dismiss.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Fairley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Apr 1, 2009
Civil No. 08-10924 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 1, 2009)
Case details for

Fairley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:ANTOINETTE FAIRLEY, Plaintiff, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Apr 1, 2009

Citations

Civil No. 08-10924 (E.D. Mich. Apr. 1, 2009)