From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fairchild v. Nelson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Oct 15, 2019
Case No. 2:17-CV-1317 DN (D. Utah Oct. 15, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 2:17-CV-1317 DN

10-15-2019

STEVEN MICHAEL FAIRCHILD, Petitioner, v. SHANE NELSON, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Based on the Tenth Circuit's limited remand, the Court considers whether to issue a certificate of appealability (COA) here. See R.11, Rs. Governing § 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts ("The district court must issue or deny a [COA] when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant.").

When a habeas petition is denied on procedural grounds, as this one was, a petitioner is entitled to a COA only if he shows that "jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (citing 28 U.S.C.S. § 2253 (2018)). Petitioner has not made this showing.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that a COA is DENIED.

DATED this 15th day of October, 2019.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

JUDGE DAVID NUFFER

United States District Court


Summaries of

Fairchild v. Nelson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Oct 15, 2019
Case No. 2:17-CV-1317 DN (D. Utah Oct. 15, 2019)
Case details for

Fairchild v. Nelson

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN MICHAEL FAIRCHILD, Petitioner, v. SHANE NELSON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH

Date published: Oct 15, 2019

Citations

Case No. 2:17-CV-1317 DN (D. Utah Oct. 15, 2019)