From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fairchild v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Feb 24, 1988
419 N.W.2d 618 (Minn. 1988)

Opinion

Nos. C1-87-1245, C3-87-1246.

February 24, 1988. Opinion below: 418 N.W.2d 196.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc. and A.O. Smith Corporation for further review of the decision of the Court of Appeals be, and the same is, granted. The petitioner shall proceed as the appellant and briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entertained.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-entitled matter is consolidated with Beutz v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc., 416 N.W.2d 482 (Minn.App. 1988).

COYNE, J., took no part.


Summaries of

Fairchild v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Feb 24, 1988
419 N.W.2d 618 (Minn. 1988)
Case details for

Fairchild v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products

Case Details

Full title:Daniel FAIRCHILD, Appellant, v. A.O. SMITH HARVESTORE PRODUCTS, INC., A.O…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Feb 24, 1988

Citations

419 N.W.2d 618 (Minn. 1988)