From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fairbanks v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Third Division
Sep 5, 2007
No. B198538 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 5, 2007)

Opinion


PAULINE FAIRBANKS et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent FARMERS NEW WORLD LIFE INSURANCE CO., et al., Defendants and Real Parties in Interest. B198538 California Court of Appeal, Second District, Third Division September 5, 2007

Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC305603

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on August 22, 2007, be modified as follows:

1. Page 2, at line 10, add a footnote designator “1” at the end of “FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND” and add the following as a new footnote 1 at the bottom of the page: “The facts that we recite are taken from the allegations of the complaint filed by the petitioner, Pauline Fairbanks. For purposes of this opinion only, we assume such allegations to be true.”

Change numbering of subsequent footnotes accordingly.

No change in judgment.


Summaries of

Fairbanks v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeals, Second District, Third Division
Sep 5, 2007
No. B198538 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Fairbanks v. Superior Court

Case Details

Full title:PAULINE FAIRBANKS et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS…

Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Third Division

Date published: Sep 5, 2007

Citations

No. B198538 (Cal. Ct. App. Sep. 5, 2007)