Fairbank v. Ayers

1 Citing case

  1. State v. Ashby

    336 Conn. 452 (Conn. 2020)   Cited 7 times
    Observing that this court may presume that legislature was aware of its decision interpreting statute when legislature later passed statutory amendment

    Even if Pladsen had subjectively believed that any of Weaver's statements constituted requests for information, it is unclear that such a belief, alone, would have created an agency relationship. See Fairbank v. Ayers , 650 F.3d 1243, 1256 (9th Cir. 2011) ("even if [the informant] subjectively believed that the officer's statement [that he was looking for the murder weapon] was a request [for that information], this does not constitute the requisite state involvement"), cert. denied, 565 U.S. 1276, 132 S. Ct. 1757, 182 L. Ed. 2d 558 (2012).