From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fair v. Atchley

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 1, 2023
2:20-cv-01107-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2023)

Opinion

2:20-cv-01107-TLN-DB

09-01-2023

JOSEPH D. FAIR, JR, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW ATCHLEY, Warden, Respondents.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge.

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 14, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Petitioner, and which contained notice to Petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 14, 2023 (ECF No. 32) are ADOPTED IN FULL.

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 15) is DENIED.

3. The Court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Fair v. Atchley

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 1, 2023
2:20-cv-01107-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Fair v. Atchley

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH D. FAIR, JR, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW ATCHLEY, Warden, Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 1, 2023

Citations

2:20-cv-01107-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 1, 2023)