Opinion
2006-195 K C.
Decided on February 27, 2007.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Bernard J. Graham, J.), entered November 23, 2005. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
Order affirmed without costs.
PRESENT: WESTON PATTERSON, J.P., RIOS and BELEN, JJ.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was supported by an affirmation from plaintiff's counsel, an affidavit by a corporate officer of plaintiff, and various documents annexed thereto. The affidavit executed by plaintiff's corporate officer stated in a conclusory manner that the documents attached to plaintiff's motion papers were plaintiff's business records. In opposition, defendant argued, inter alia, that the affidavit by plaintiff's corporate officer failed to lay a proper foundation for the documents annexed to plaintiff's moving papers and that, as a result, plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. Plaintiff appeals from the denial of its motion for summary judgment.
Inasmuch as the affidavit submitted by plaintiff's corporate officer was insufficient to establish that said officer possessed personal knowledge of plaintiff's practices and procedures so as to lay a foundation for the admission, as business records, of the documents annexed to plaintiff's moving papers, plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing of its entitlement to summary judgment ( see Dan Med., P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., ___ Misc 3d ___, 2006 NY Slip Op 26483 [App Term, 2d 11th Jud Dists]). Consequently, plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was properly denied.
Weston Patterson, J.P., Rios and Belen, JJ., concur.