From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fain v. Benak

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 18, 2022
345 Conn. 912 (Conn. 2022)

Opinion

SC 20629

10-18-2022

Marie FAIN v. Bethany BENAK et al.

Kevin S. Coyne, Stratford, with whom, on the brief, was James E. Coyne, Stratford, for the appellant (defendant Department of Administrative Services). Charles K. Norris, Norwich, with whom, on the brief, was Anthony D. Sutton, for the appellee (plaintiff). Jeremy H. D'Amico filed a brief for the Connecticut Trial Lawyers Association as amicus curiae.


Kevin S. Coyne, Stratford, with whom, on the brief, was James E. Coyne, Stratford, for the appellant (defendant Department of Administrative Services).

Charles K. Norris, Norwich, with whom, on the brief, was Anthony D. Sutton, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Jeremy H. D'Amico filed a brief for the Connecticut Trial Lawyers Association as amicus curiae.

Robinson, C. J., and D'Auria, Mullins, Ecker and Alexander, Js.

PER CURIAM.

After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed.


Summaries of

Fain v. Benak

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 18, 2022
345 Conn. 912 (Conn. 2022)
Case details for

Fain v. Benak

Case Details

Full title:Marie FAIN v. Bethany BENAK et al.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Oct 18, 2022

Citations

345 Conn. 912 (Conn. 2022)
283 A.3d 980

Citing Cases

Prioleau v. Agosta

(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Fain v. Benak , 205 Conn. App. 734, 746, 258 A.3d 112 (2021), appeal…

Kuselias v. Zingaro Cretella, LLC

(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Fain v. Benak, 205 Conn. App. 734, 746, 258 A.3d 112 (2021), appeal…