From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faigle v. Bockroth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1913
155 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)

Opinion

February, 1913.


Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that it was error to charge that the jury could find the defendant liable, even if the ladder was shifted. The weight of evidence is that it was shifted. Jenks, P.J., Thomas and Carr, JJ., concurred; Woodward and Rich, JJ., dissented.


Summaries of

Faigle v. Bockroth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1913
155 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Case details for

Faigle v. Bockroth

Case Details

Full title:John Faigle, Respondent, v. Henry Bockroth and Robert T. Buttleman…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1913

Citations

155 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)