From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faidley v. Fisher

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 18, 2010
Civil No. 09-2531 (DWF/JJK) (D. Minn. Aug. 18, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-2531 (DWF/JJK).

August 18, 2010

Jeffrey Allen Faidley, Pro Se, Petitioner.

Ana H. Voss and Gregroy G. Brooker, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, counsel for Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This matter is before the Court upon Petitioner Jeffrey Allen Faidley's ("Petitioner") objections to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes's Report and Recommendation dated June 28, 2010, insofar as it recommends that Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 by a Person in Federal Custody, and his Pro Se Petition to Amend Title 28 U.S.C.S. 2241 Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief through Interlineation be denied and that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Respondent Warden Scott Fisher ("Respondent"), appearing through his attorneys, United States Attorney B. Todd Jones and Assistant United States Attorney Ana H. Voss, filed a Response of United States to Petitioner's Objection to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendations on July 23, 2010 (Doc. No. 15).

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.1(c). Based upon the Court's review of the record, the Court's review of the arguments and submissions of the parties, and the Court being otherwise duly advised in the premises, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Keyes in all respects.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes's Report and Recommendation dated June 28, 2010 (Doc. No. [13]) is ADOPTED.

2. Petitioner's Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. No. [1]), and his Pro Se Petition to Amend Title 28 U.S.C.S. 2241 Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief through Interlineation (Doc. No. [10]), are DENIED.

3. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

Faidley v. Fisher

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Aug 18, 2010
Civil No. 09-2531 (DWF/JJK) (D. Minn. Aug. 18, 2010)
Case details for

Faidley v. Fisher

Case Details

Full title:Jeffrey Allen Faidley, Petitioner, v. Warden Scott Fisher, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Aug 18, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 09-2531 (DWF/JJK) (D. Minn. Aug. 18, 2010)

Citing Cases

Martinez v. Paul

" Munz v. Michael, 28 F.3d 795, 798 (8th Cir. 1994); see also Faidley v. Fisher, No. CIV. 09-2531 DWF/JJK,…