From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fahey v. Breakthrough Films & Television Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 30, 2022
21 CIVIL 3208 (PAE)(SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2022)

Opinion

21 CIVIL 3208 (PAE)(SLC)

09-30-2022

SEAN P. FAHEY and DIETERICH GRAY, Plaintiffs, v. BREAKTHROUGH FILMS & TELEVISION INC., BREAKTHROUGH ENTERTAINMENT, IRA LEVY, and LAUREN LEINBURD, Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated September 29, 2022, the Court adopts adopts Judge Cave's perceptive and convincing Report and Recommendation insofar as it finds a lack of personal jurisdiction over Defendants, and grants Defendants' motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(2). This dismissal is without prejudice. The Court denies Plaintiffs' requests for jurisdictional discovery and for transfer to another District; accordingly, the case is closed.


Summaries of

Fahey v. Breakthrough Films & Television Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 30, 2022
21 CIVIL 3208 (PAE)(SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2022)
Case details for

Fahey v. Breakthrough Films & Television Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SEAN P. FAHEY and DIETERICH GRAY, Plaintiffs, v. BREAKTHROUGH FILMS …

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 30, 2022

Citations

21 CIVIL 3208 (PAE)(SLC) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 30, 2022)