From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faheem v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC (In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 7, 2012
MDL NO. 1871 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2012)

Opinion

MDL NO. 1871 07-MD-01871 CIVIL ACTION No. 11-695 No. 11-3031

08-07-2012

In re: AVANDIA MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO: Amjad Faheem v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC Marvin Rainey v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC


HON. CYNTHIA M. RUFE


ORDER

AND NOW, this 7th day of August 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment [MDL Doc. No. 1890] and Plaintiffs' Rule 56(d) Motions [MDL Doc. No. 1917] the responses and replies thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED as to all personal-injury tort claims asserted by Plaintiffs in the above-captioned cases.

2. The Motions Pursuant to Rule 56(d) are DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

____________________

CYNTHIA M. RUFE , J.


Summaries of

Faheem v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC (In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Aug 7, 2012
MDL NO. 1871 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Faheem v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC (In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.)

Case Details

Full title:In re: AVANDIA MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Aug 7, 2012

Citations

MDL NO. 1871 (E.D. Pa. Aug. 7, 2012)

Citing Cases

Slater v. Biomet, Inc.

In In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation , Judge Rufe held that a bar…

Bailey v. Pfizer, Inc. (In re Zoloft (Sertraline Hydrochloride) Prods. Liab. Litig.)

See, e.g., Flamer v. New Jersey Transit Bus Operations, Inc., 607 A.2d 260, 264 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992). This…