Opinion
Civil Action 23-4920
08-08-2024
ALPHONSO NICHOLAS FAGGIOLO, Plaintiff, v. BOROUGH OF RIDLEY PARK, et al., Defendants.
ORDER
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.
AND NOW, this 8th day of August 2024, upon consideration of Defendant Mary Walk's Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Doc. No. 11), Defendants Borough of Ridley Park and Richard Tutak's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 13), Defendants Michelle Portnoff and Robert P. Daday's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. No. 15), Defendant Barry C. Dozer's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 16), and Plaintiff's Responses in Opposition (Doc. Nos. 17, 18, 19, 23), and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendant Mary Walk's Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Doc. No. 11) is GRANTED.
2. Defendants Borough of Ridley Park and Richard Tutak's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED.
3. Defendants Michelle Portnoff and Robert P. Daday's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED.
4. Defendant Barry C. Dozor's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED.
5. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 1) is DISMISSED.
6. All open Motions in this Case are DENIED as MOOT.
7. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the above-captioned case.