From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Faden v. Satterlee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 2008
52 A.D.3d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2007-06325.

June 17, 2008.

In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Palmieri, J.), dated May 22, 2007, which granted the defendants' motion, inter alia, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) to dismiss the complaint.

Brian C. Rappaport, P.C., Mineola, N.Y. (Susan R. Nudelman of counsel), for appellant.

atterlee Stephens Burke Burke, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Alun W. Griffiths of counsel), respondent pro se and for remaining respondent.

Before: Miller, J.P., Dillon, Balkin and Chambers, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants were entitled to dismissal of the complaint based upon documentary evidence that conclusively established a defense to the action ( see CPLR 3211 [a] [1]; Malarkey v Piel, 7 AD3d 681). The defendants submitted a stockholders' agreement signed by the plaintiff which conclusively disposed of his legal malpractice claim ( see Bishop v Maurer, 33 AD3d 497, 499, affd 9 NY3d 910; Beattie v Brown Wood, 243 AD2d 395; Lunney Crocco v Wolfe, 243 AD2d 348).


Summaries of

Faden v. Satterlee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 17, 2008
52 A.D.3d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Faden v. Satterlee

Case Details

Full title:BRAD FADEN, Appellant, v. SATTERLEE STEPHENS BURKE BURKE, LLP, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 17, 2008

Citations

52 A.D.3d 652 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 5651
858 N.Y.S.2d 914

Citing Cases

Jean–Baptiste v. Mock

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was pursuant to CPLR…