From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Fadel v. Colonial Indemnity Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 31, 1996
227 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

May 31, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Howe, J.

Present — Lawton, J.P., Fallon, Callahan and Davis, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the motion of defendant, Colonial Indemnity Insurance Company (Colonial), for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff seeks to recover insurance proceeds under a policy of insurance issued to plaintiff by Colonial covering a building destroyed by fire. From our review of the record, we conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, issues of fact exist whether plaintiff materially and substantially increased the hazard protected against under the terms of the policy by permitting the tenants in the upper front residential unit to burn candles at a time when electric service to that apartment had been terminated, thereby relieving Colonial of its obligations under the policy ( see, Williams v. People's Fire Ins. Co., 57 N.Y. 274, 277; Frost House v. Preferred Mut. Ins. Co., 15 A.D.2d 741).


Summaries of

Fadel v. Colonial Indemnity Insurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 31, 1996
227 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Fadel v. Colonial Indemnity Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:ABDO FADEL, Appellant, v. COLONIAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 31, 1996

Citations

227 A.D.2d 950 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
643 N.Y.S.2d 843

Citing Cases

Majtan v. Madison Mutual Insurance Company

An increase in the hazard insured against "takes place when a new use is made of the property, or when its…

Delaine v. Finger Lakes Fire Casualty Co.

the record and grant partial summary judgment to plaintiff, but "only with respect to [an affirmative…